Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

2011 F150 5.0 dyno graph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2011, 03:52 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
69redmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default 2011 F150 5.0 dyno graph

Hi guys, I'm new to this forum. I purchased my truck last week, it has about 250 miles on it. It's a SCREW Lauriat 4x4 with 3.55 gears. Without going into any details I own a Dynojet Chassis dyno at my shop. I decided to put my truck on the rollers today just to see how it would do stock with 87 octane. This is a third gear pull so I could stay off that speed limiter. Enjoy.
Pete
Attached Thumbnails 2011 F150 5.0 dyno graph-pete-1.jpg  
The following 2 users liked this post by 69redmach1:
isthatahemi (08-22-2012), Kenferg1 (08-20-2012)
Old 08-07-2011, 06:34 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Deerhunter4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 889
Received 54 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Nice. Those are some good numbers.
Old 08-07-2011, 06:47 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,225
Received 167 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Corrected or raw numbers?
Old 08-07-2011, 07:18 PM
  #4  
Go Blue
 
GRWolverineFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hudsonville, MI
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I am not mistaken it says CF:SAE in the top right corner so my guess is those are corrected.
Old 08-07-2011, 09:28 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
ajrothm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 198
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Thanks for posting....

Good "HONEST" numbers..... aside from all the Magazine BS or Ford BS...

HP holds on longer up top then a lot of other reports....good to see.

Do you think it would have made more power in 4th (ie. 1-1) ? I am sure any difference would have been marginal at best...

Did you wideband it as well? I am curious to see the AFR with the stock Ford tuning.... I am sure its quite rich...


Last edited by ajrothm; 08-07-2011 at 09:31 PM.
Old 08-07-2011, 10:10 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ajrothm
Thanks for posting....

Good "HONEST" numbers..... aside from all the Magazine BS or Ford BS...

HP holds on longer up top then a lot of other reports....good to see.

Do you think it would have made more power in 4th (ie. 1-1) ? I am sure any difference would have been marginal at best...

Did you wideband it as well? I am curious to see the AFR with the stock Ford tuning.... I am sure its quite rich...

I dont believe 4th is a 1:1 either.
Old 08-08-2011, 06:35 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
69redmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The lower section of the graph is the a/f. The reference line is at 13:1. The a/f is actually pretty good, just above 12:1 at the top, I've seen worse. We did a 4th gear pull up to the speed limiter and there was only about 5hp difference. It would have surpassed 300 anyway. I've got the 20" wheels as well which is a little more rotating weight which will affect the numbers.
Old 08-09-2011, 05:26 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
ajrothm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 198
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69redmach1
The lower section of the graph is the a/f. The reference line is at 13:1. The a/f is actually pretty good, just above 12:1 at the top, I've seen worse. We did a 4th gear pull up to the speed limiter and there was only about 5hp difference. It would have surpassed 300 anyway. I've got the 20" wheels as well which is a little more rotating weight which will affect the numbers.
Lol...my phone must have cut the bottom of the chart off because I damn sure didn't see the afr graph.....the fuel tuning looks pretty damn good for stock...you could probably pull some fuel a gain a few hp on the dyno but it will likely run more mph with the afr in the 12s as it sits... Probably could use some timing though if you wanna run 93. Still damn good numbers for bone stock.....full bolt ons and headers would be 350rwhp no problem...
Old 08-20-2012, 12:48 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
jonbar87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Around
Posts: 1,304
Received 133 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69redmach1
Hi guys, I'm new to this forum. I purchased my truck last week, it has about 250 miles on it. It's a SCREW Lauriat 4x4 with 3.55 gears. Without going into any details I own a Dynojet Chassis dyno at my shop. I decided to put my truck on the rollers today just to see how it would do stock with 87 octane. This is a third gear pull so I could stay off that speed limiter. Enjoy.
Pete
Thanks for the graph! Very nice power curve. Anyone else dyno'd their 5.0L yet? I hate how the ecoboost get's all the attention and everyone leaves the 5.0 out of the picture...

I plan on dynoing mine in the near future and will post results.
Old 08-20-2012, 04:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
NOLAGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lafayette, la
Posts: 1,002
Received 67 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Here is mine before the roush blower and after. Before was in 3rd after was in 3rd as well since roush keeps the 95 spd limit in there craptastic tune. I will be getting a better tune once my Itsx acts right and shoot for 500rwhp and some better tq.

12 fx4 screw with 20's and 3.73.

also the gear ratios are:

1st: 4.17:1
2nd: 2.34:1
3rd: 1.52:1
4th: 1.14:1
5th: .86:1
6th: .69:1



Last edited by NOLAGT; 08-20-2012 at 04:05 PM.


Quick Reply: 2011 F150 5.0 dyno graph



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 PM.